Differences emerged in Congress regarding RCEP | Differences emerged in Congress over RCEP

New Delhi, 18 November (IANS). Different Congress leaders have differing views on the issue of joining the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), even though a year has passed since the party took a stand on the deal, which India did not sign.

After eight years of tough negotiations, on November 15, all ASEAN countries (including Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam) signed the five FTA partners – China, Japan, on the trade agreement. Signed with South Korea, Australia and New Zealand.

The Congress then urged the government not to join it. As India decided to stay away from it last year.

The issue remained open for debate as the party awaited the stand of former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram, who had reserved his view till Tuesday.

While Anand Sharma termed not joining the RCEP as a backward leap, Jairam Ramesh said that not being involved in the economic deal meant that the Congress was right to say.

On October 21, 2019, Ramesh said that this would be the third economic setback if India joins RCEP after demonetisation and GST.

The Congress has argued that the regional economic deal will kill the domestic industry because the economy is not as buoyant as it was during the UPA regime.

At the same time, Sharma said, India’s decision not to join RCEP is unfortunate. Getting involved is in India’s strategic and economic interests to be part of the process of Asia-Pacific integration.

Sharma said, the years-old settlement negotiations have been neglected to be accepted as part of the RCEP in India. We can negotiate safeguards to protect our interests. Staying out of RCEP is a backward step.

Sharma’s statement came after Chidambaram criticized the Modi government’s stand on RCEP, but said he would preserve his decision until the Congress took an official stand on the issue.

Chidambaram said on Monday, Foreign Minister S.K. Jaishankar had also expressed displeasure over the speech, where he spoke out against trade agreements and praised the virtues of protectionism.

Chidambaram said, Mr. Jaishankar is speaking in that language and the words that I heard in the 1970s and 1980s.

Chidambaram said that there are pros and cons of joining India’s RCEP. But this debate never took place between Parliament or the people or opposition parties. This is another bad example of a centralized decision.

However, the Congress had expressed concern over joining the RCEP, which became the world’s largest trading body of 15 countries in the Asia-Pacific region.



Author: Admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *